From: Marc Branchaud Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 14:20:13 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] tag: duplicate mention of --contains should mention --no-contains Message-ID: <28535adf-5f8f-a43d-82e9-2ada398637e2@xiplink.com> In-Reply-To: <20170515122331.17348-1-avarab@gmail.com> On 2017-05-15 08:23 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > Fix a duplicate mention of --contains in the SYNOPSIS to mention > --no-contains. > > This fixes an error introduced in my commit ac3f5a3468 ("ref-filter: > add --no-contains option to tag/branch/for-each-ref", 2017-03-24). > > Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason > --- > Documentation/git-tag.txt | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/git-tag.txt b/Documentation/git-tag.txt > index f8a0b787f4..1eb15afa1c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/git-tag.txt > +++ b/Documentation/git-tag.txt > @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ SYNOPSIS > 'git tag' [-a | -s | -u ] [-f] [-m | -F ] > [ | ] > 'git tag' -d ... > -'git tag' [-n[]] -l [--contains ] [--contains ] > +'git tag' [-n[]] -l [--contains ] [--no-contains ] I think [--[no-]contains ] is the usual pattern... > [--points-at ] [--column[=] | --no-column] > [--create-reflog] [--sort=] [--format=] > [--[no-]merged []] [...] ... like with --[no-]merged, there. M.