From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 18:27:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] jk/loose-object-cache sha1/object_id fixups
Message-ID: <27ac5d02-e2a5-9d1d-9974-8ca740efa978@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmuob58gu.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 1/8/2019 1:07 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> Yeah, they should. I think one of them will need René's patch, which
>> changes the body of quick_has_loose(). I can roll it as a separate topic
>> if that's easier (or just wait a week or so until René's cleanups
>> graduate).
> Nah, what I got is already good to work with.  Both series are
> straight-forward and I do not expect them needing long fermentation.

I'm just chiming in to say that this series was a very satisfying read, 
and the changes were clear-cut and mechanical.

Thanks!
-Stolee