From: Eric Raible Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:29:08 GMT Subject: Re: [RFC] Colorization of log --graph Message-ID: <279b37b20903181029q7a526168y360874a48783d1dc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Santi Béjar wrote: > Gitk paints lines of development (lineal history without merges nor > forks) with the same color. > > HTH, > Santi Thanks for the quick reply. I suppose I realized that but it just doesn't seem that profound. Don't get me wrong - I like gitk and still prefer it to any of the alternatives. But its of color seems more flashy than useful to me. Perhaps I'd be happier if the color of the nth parent of a merge (selectable, first by default) emerged from the merge? I dunno.