From: Howard Miller <howard@e-learndesign.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:40:30 GMT
Subject: Re: Any way to "flatten" a series of changes in git
Message-ID: <26ae428a0910222240w7956e57dn325afcdd15aa2cb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <26ae428a0910222236l58bc64b7l12c4cff09b086dac@mail.gmail.com>

>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Yes it helps a lot. What I *don't* care about (or want to do) is
> actually do a merge or a rebase I just want to change history. Well,
> that's what I thought I wanted. What I suppose I really want is the
> full history for *me* and a second branch with the 'reduced' history
> to push to my client.  I suppose that's different yet again?
>
> Howard
>

Actually, what I should have said in the first place is that this is
specifically nothing to do with the main trunk. We are doing small
custom developments for clients away from the main project
development. So we specifically don't want to merge or rebase with the
master - that's never going to happen. I want to keep the development
branch in tact for my reference, but when I push (the custom
development branch) to the client I need that sanitized. I think I
finally have it clear in my own head now!

Howard