From: David Jeske <jeske@willowmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 00:08:57 GMT
Subject: Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits
Message-ID: <25838.9547271237$1214615417@news.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <9af502e50806271555j3cd06ecau122b11217f612217@mail.gmail.com>

-- Robert Anderson wrote:
> Possibly a succinct way of moving this conversation forward is to say that:
>
> What is desired is a workflow where partial commits can be tested,
> when it is desirable not to change history.

Why don't we just make a model where history changes are handled safetly? Then
we don't have to be afraid to publish DAGs we may want to change later.