From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2025 08:33:40 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] usage: allow dying without writing an error message
Message-ID: <256e9e60-fdea-461b-b43c-8e6024b773a2@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOLa=ZTLvL52UpZZbXtMefHPE+s5PWhUR4ZLgB6T_JMFjqfBZg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 3, 2025, at 10:31, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
>
>> Sometimes code wants to die in a situation where it already has written
>> an error message. To use the same error code as `die()` we have to open
>> code the code with a call to `exit(128)` in such cases, which is easy to
>
> Nit: This reads a little weird.

Maybe s/to open code the code/to open-code the code/