From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 21:09:18 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] read-cache: use size_t for {base,df}_name_compare()
Message-ID: <230205.86y1pb7r9m.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <d272fd03-a005-f6ad-3f00-6b1a970a519f@web.de>


On Sun, Feb 05 2023, René Scharfe wrote:

> Support names of any length in base_name_compare() and df_name_compare()
> by using size_t for their length parameters.  They pass the length on to
> memcmp(3), which also takes it as a size_t.

This looks good, and it's nice to see changes that slowly address the
greater topic of our outstanding -Werror=sign-compare issues.