From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 17:21:18 GMT
Subject: Re: jk/unused-annotation + ab/unused-annotation
Message-ID: <220831.86tu5s8h1a.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr10wgz64.fsf@gitster.g>


On Wed, Aug 31 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> Yeah, I think we should use the deprecated attribute. Since the original
>> has been reverted, I think the next step would be for me to fix up the
>> patches to use that approach from the start, and re-submit.
>>
>> I was dragging my feet a little hoping that we might get some coccinelle
>> parsing miracle in the interim.
>
> Yup, that was why I ignored the "deprecated" one when I dealt with
> the replacement series yesterday.

Ah, even if that's the case we'd need to start requiring bleeding-edge
spatch, which doesn't seem practical to me, and would reduce the
audience for our rules.

Or we'd need to split off the "bleeding edge" rules, or something...