From: Louis-Alexandre Stuber <stuberl@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 09:41:44 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] bisect: simplify the add of new bisect terms
Message-ID: <2070840481.381260.1433929304815.JavaMail.zimbra@ensimag.grenoble-inp.fr>
In-Reply-To: <vpqk2vcat2t.fsf@anie.imag.fr>

But ENOENT is not a normal case at all. Should we not treat it the same
way as other fopen() errors ? (either going on with default case or
returning an error)

Would :

>	if (!fp) {
>			die("could not read file '%s': %s",
>				filename, strerror(errno));
>	} else {

be ok ?