From: Maciej Ciemborowicz Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:02:05 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] fetch, remote: retain old OIDs when pruning refs Message-ID: <20260923210205.59543-1-maciej.ciemborowicz@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: > Isn't adding a new parameter to refs_delete_refs() needed before > this step? The corresponding changes to refs.[ch] was done in > [1/3], and the fact that the callsite receives this update to add an > extra parameter this late in the series means [1/3] and [2/3] does > not even compile, right? You are right. I updated only some of the call sites in 1/3 and left the others for the patches that begin supplying the new arguments. As a result, the intermediate commits do not compile. I have corrected the local series by updating every call site for the new signature in 1/3, with NULL for optional data that is supplied only by the later patches. I also built the tree after each patch. The final tree remains identical to v4. Thanks for catching this.