From: Todd Zullinger Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:46:26 GMT Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] doc lint fixes for pack-refs and refs Message-ID: <20260914124630.154107-1-tmz@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <20260912191509.844954-1-tmz@pobox.com> I was reading git-refs(1) after noticing it learned some new tricks in the 2.56.0 release notes. The formatting stood out because the first two commands, migrate and verify are bold (in the man pages) but subsequent commands are not. The HTML is similarly affected, with those commands colored differently than the rest in our online documentation: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-refs This is due to inconsistent backtick-quotes. As git-refs.adoc includes pack-refs-options.adoc, I updated it to consistently use backtick quoting and converted the only other file which includes it, git-pack-refs.adoc. Changes since v1: * Drop Documentation/lint-documentation-style.perl change. It is likely to cause more false positives than we want. Todd Zullinger (2): doc/pack-refs: convert synopsis and options to new style doc/refs: backtick-quote commands and options consistently Documentation/git-pack-refs.adoc | 8 ++++---- Documentation/git-refs.adoc | 14 +++++++------- Documentation/pack-refs-options.adoc | 10 +++++----- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) Range-diff against v1: 1: 03c1e8c073 < -: ---------- doc lint: match commands as well as options for synopsis style check 2: eb3b95c7a7 = 1: 3de9d9a6bf doc/pack-refs: convert synopsis and options to new style 3: 7af3718a71 = 2: b3789f7591 doc/refs: backtick-quote commands and options consistently -- 2.56.0.rc0