From: Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 09:22:58 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
Message-ID: <20260313092258.30682-1-haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqjyvgesjx.fsf@gitster.g>

> With this, shouldn't "-m" become a synonym for "--autostash"?
> For users of "checkout -m", this is a strictly improved version of
> the same feature, it seems.
>
> Also, "stash" is merely an implementation detail of how we make the
> merge safer, so from end-user's point of view, this feature is more
> like "switch to the other branch, while merging the local changes
> there", so calling it "--merge" or something may be much better than
> calling it "--autostash".

That's an interesting idea and I gave it a shot! I do worry about breaking
the existing '-m' flow because I don't understand its fundamentals.

But tests old seem to be passing (well, they did break and then I fixed the
code to make them pass again), so that's promising. Although hard for me to
say if the old test coverage protects against all possible regressions.

> Other than that, I like the implementation in general.

Thanks for all your support, Junio!


Harald