From: Jeff King Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2026 22:02:14 GMT Subject: Re: memory leak when cloning a repository Message-ID: <20260305220214.GB736322@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 12:51:17PM -0800, Jacob Keller wrote: > I tried digging into why this leak occurs but so far I don't have a good idea. > > This happens when running on next: 7842e34a6654 ("Sync with 'master'") I can reproduce it on master. This seems to fix it: diff --git a/connected.c b/connected.c index 79403108dd..e0f8ff38cb 100644 --- a/connected.c +++ b/connected.c @@ -90,6 +90,7 @@ int check_connected(oid_iterate_fn fn, void *cb_data, promisor_pack_found: ; } while ((oid = fn(cb_data)) != NULL); + close_pack(new_pack); free(new_pack); return 0; } @@ -128,6 +129,7 @@ int check_connected(oid_iterate_fn fn, void *cb_data, rev_list.no_stderr = opt->quiet; if (start_command(&rev_list)) { + close_pack(new_pack); free(new_pack); return error(_("Could not run 'git rev-list'")); } @@ -162,6 +164,7 @@ int check_connected(oid_iterate_fn fn, void *cb_data, err = error_errno(_("failed to close rev-list's stdin")); sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE); + close_pack(new_pack); free(new_pack); return finish_command(&rev_list) || err; } I think this has been leaky forever, but it's usually leaking a single mmap, so nobody notices. But I noticed something odd about your trace: > Direct leak of 27168 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from: > #0 0x7f0e100e6f2b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe6f2b) (BuildId: 25975f766867e9e604dc5a71a8befeaed3301942) > #1 0x00000122ab77 in git_mmap ../compat/mmap.c:15 > #2 0x000001169466 in xmmap_gently ../wrapper.c:884 > #3 0x00000116959b in xmmap ../wrapper.c:907 > #4 0x000000d168fd in check_packed_git_idx ../packfile.c:179 > #5 0x000000d16cce in open_pack_index ../packfile.c:282 > #6 0x000000d25273 in find_pack_entry_one ../packfile.c:2078 > #7 0x00000099f969 in check_connected ../connected.c:148 We're in the compat git_mmap, which implies you're building with NO_MMAP. We turn that on automatically when building with ASan (so that we can detect single-byte overflows even when mmap would round up to a page boundary). But as a side effect, the "mmap" for index and pack data is done with a heap-allocated buffer. So now ASan/LSan will notice and complain about it. We usually disable leak-checking for our ASan builds, so we wouldn't run the tests with the compat mmap. And our leak-checking builds use LSan, which doesn't set NO_MMAP. But if you combine them with: make SANITIZE=address,leak or even just build with: make NO_MMAP=MallocHarder SANITIZE=leak then the leak will be reported. I guess maybe you're building with SANITIZE=address, but then running the result independently, without setting ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_leaks=0. Anyway, I think the solution is probably something like the patch above, though probably it needs to cover the case where new_pack is NULL. -Peff