From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 10:50:23 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] last-modified: fix bug caused by inproper initialized memory
Message-ID: <20251129105023.GA646133@coredump.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <5699f2cc-5157-441e-af98-4d8df492ec72@mit.edu>

On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 02:20:22PM -0800, Anders Kaseorg wrote:

> On 11/28/25 12:55, Jeff King wrote:
> > In the same vein, probably using "sizeof(lm->scratch->words)" is better
> > than "sizeof(eword_t)". But again, I find it an unlikely detail for us
> > to catch under the hood.
> 
> As words is a pointer, you must have meant sizeof *lm->scratch->words or
> sizeof lm->scratch->words[0].

Whoops, yes. I prefer sizeof(*var) over sizeof(type) because it tracks
changes to the type of "var" automatically. But the opportunity to
forget the "*" is perhaps a point against it. :)

-Peff