From: Jeff King Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 09:47:22 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] diff: stop output garbled message in dry run mode Message-ID: <20251018094722.GC1060824@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <6C994C9C-0034-46D0-8112-FF88773B5CF5@gmail.com> On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 09:11:34AM +0800, Lidong Yan wrote: > > Test that exercises "git diff -I" is in line with what the > > original b55e6d36eb wanted to address, but given that we saw a > > recent regression report like [*], I would have liked to see "git > > diff --quiet" in the test as well. > > I will read Peff’s test and see if I should also add some similar tests What I was hoping was that we'd apply my patch, as a matter of release engineering (backing out the regression-causing bit of b55e6d36eb). And then you could make more-specific fixes on top (since -I would still have potential problems). And then you don't need to add a test for the regression case, since it's already there. -Peff