From: Jeff King Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:23:04 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] doc: change the markup of paragraphs following a nested list item Message-ID: <20251010222304.GA2007405@coredump.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 09:11:16AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> diff --git a/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc > >> b/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc index 49a7598ca5..aaea8c107f 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc > >> +++ b/Documentation/config/extensions.adoc > >> @@ -55,8 +55,9 @@ For historical reasons, this extension is respected > > regardless of > >> the refStorage::: > >> Specify the ref storage format to use. The acceptable values are: > >> + > >> +-- > >> include::../ref-storage-format.adoc[] > >> - > >> +-- > >> + > >> Note that this setting should only be set by linkgit:git-init[1] or > >> linkgit:git-clone[1]. Trying to change it after initialization will not > >> > >> on top of your patch seems to do the right thing (no change in asciidoc, > >> and eliminating the regression from your patch). It's a little gross > >> because we are reaching across the include to realize that > >> ref-storage-format.adoc contains a list that needs to go into its own > >> block. I wonder if asciidoc implicitly opens a new block for an include > >> but asciidoctor doesn't. But at any rate, this is the only way I could > >> come up with for both to render correctly. > > > > Thank you for cross-checking. This is indeed almost impossible to mechanize > > such testing at the moment. > > Thanks, both. > > So we'd see an update to this (I think this is already in 'next')? I think we already did, in: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20251007082223.GA3336685@coredump.intra.peff.net/ and you queued that on the topic (and merged it to next already). Or am I misunderstanding the question? -Peff