From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:30:32 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] index-pack: fsck honor checks
Message-ID: <20240131223032.4065897-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <BE30DB47-1488-40A3-BD0C-804F97DE0C88@gmail.com>

John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Jonathan,
> 
> On 26 Jan 2024, at 17:13, Jonathan Tan wrote:
> 
> > Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> >>>      ++--fsck-objects[=<msg-id>=<severity>...]::
> >>>      ++	Die if the pack contains broken objects. If the pack contains a tree
> >>>      ++	pointing to a .gitmodules blob that does not exist, prints the hash of
> >>>      ++	that blob (for the caller to check) after the hash that goes into the
> >>>      ++	name of the pack/idx file (see "Notes").

> Thanks for clarifying! Would you mind providing a patch to revise the wording
> here to make it clearer? I would try but I feel like I might get the wording
> wrong.

I think the wording there is already mostly correct, except maybe make
everything plural (a tree -> trees, a .gitmodules blob -> .gitmodules
blobs, hash of that blob -> hashes of those blobs). We might also need
to modify a test to show that the current code indeed handles the plural
situation correctly. I don't have time right now to get to this, so
hopefully someone could pick this up.