From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 18:17:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] object-file: refactor map_loose_object_1()
Message-ID: <20221209181704.106534-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <Y5KWpXwxdRI4QPNl@coredump.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> If you take my suggestion on patch 3, then the only other caller of
> map_loose_object_1() goes away, and we can fold it all into one
> reasonably-named function:

Ah, that is true as of this patch, but patch 3 introduces another caller
of this function. I tried to allude to it in the commit message, but if
there is a clearer way to explain that, please let me know.