From: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 06:20:34 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fetch-pack: make unexpected peek result non-fatal
Message-ID: <20220517062035.3648639-1-jonathantanmy@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr14t4fwf.fsf@gitster.g>

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> We used to die unless READ_NORMAL was returned, so the code after
> packet_reader_peek() can rely on reader->line to be populated.  Now
> that code must handle cases where an earlier _peek() gave something
> other than READ_NORMAL and in such an error case reader->line points
> at NULL.  So any code that assumed reader->line was populated needs
> to be updated.
> 
> Makes sense.

Thanks for taking a look. Yes, that's correct.