From: Fabian Stelzer Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 11:51:14 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] gpg-interface/gpgsm: fix for v2.3 Message-ID: <20220303115114.7pbnggjccku44wqa@fs> In-Reply-To: On 02.03.2022 11:18, Junio C Hamano wrote: >Fabian Stelzer writes: > >> Checking if signing was successful will now accept '[GNUPG]: >> SIG_CREATED' on any beginning of a line. Not just explictly the second >> one anymore. > >"the second or subsequent one", I would think, but the code change >looks correct anyway. > >> Switch to gpg's `--with-colons` output format to make >> parsing more robust. This avoids issues where the >> human-readable output from gpg commands changes. > >Does this refer only to how parsing in tests is done? If only refers to the test prerequisite actually. I'll update the message. > >> Adjust error messages checking in tests for v2.3 specific output changes. > >Does this refer only to the change to 4202 where "failed to find >the" and the colon after "certificate" are made optional, so that >the regexp can read messages from both pre- and post-2.3 versions? > >> diff --git a/t/lib-gpg.sh b/t/lib-gpg.sh >> index 3e7ee1386a..6bc083ca77 100644 >> --- a/t/lib-gpg.sh >> +++ b/t/lib-gpg.sh >> @@ -72,12 +72,10 @@ test_lazy_prereq GPGSM ' >> --passphrase-fd 0 --pinentry-mode loopback \ >> --import "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-gpg/gpgsm_cert.p12 && >> >> - gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -K | >> - grep fingerprint: | >> - cut -d" " -f4 | >> - tr -d "\\n" >"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" && >> + gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" -K --with-colons | >> + awk -F ":" "/^fpr:/ {printf \"%s S relax\\n\", \$10}" \ >> + >"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" && > >The old iteration had (fpr|fingerprint) which appeared as if it were >catering to both pre- and post-2.3 versions, but "with colons", all >versions we care about would say "fpr" and that is the reason why we >no longer have such an alternative here? Just checking my >understanding. Correct. The `with-colons` always uses fpr pre and post 2.3 > >> - echo " S relax" >>"${GNUPGHOME}/trustlist.txt" && > >This removal is because...? I do not recall seeing the explanation >in the proposed log message. Switching to awk allows us to integrate this trailing info into the awk expression itself making this extra echo unnecessary. > >> echo hello | gpgsm --homedir "${GNUPGHOME}" >/dev/null \ >> -u committer@example.com -o /dev/null --sign - >> ' >> diff --git a/t/t4202-log.sh b/t/t4202-log.sh >> index 55fac64446..d599bf4b11 100755 >> --- a/t/t4202-log.sh >> +++ b/t/t4202-log.sh >> @@ -2037,7 +2037,7 @@ test_expect_success GPGSM 'log --graph --show-signature for merged tag x509 miss >> git merge --no-ff -m msg signed_tag_x509_nokey && >> GNUPGHOME=. git log --graph --show-signature -n1 plain-x509-nokey >actual && >> grep "^|\\\ merged tag" actual && >> - grep "^| | gpgsm: certificate not found" actual >> + grep -Ei "^| | gpgsm:( failed to find the)? certificate:? not found" actual >> ' > >OK. It might be easier to read if we give two expressions >separately and say "we can take either of these", i.e. > > # the former is from pre-2.3, the latter is from 2.3 and later > grep -e "^| | gpgsm: certificate not found" \ > -e "^| | gpgsm: failed to find the certificate: not found" \ > actual > >Thanks for working on this update. Easy enough. Initially I used a subshell and 2 grep calls but this is obviously easier. I prefer the static strings over the regex as well. I'll send a new patch probably tomorrow and try to improve the commit message. Thanks