From: Tom Saeger Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2021 20:21:42 GMT Subject: Re: should git maintenance prefetch be taught to honor remote.fetch refspec? Message-ID: <20210403202142.w4b25fhptcaguxyx@brm-x62-17.us.oracle.com> In-Reply-To: On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 06:32:56PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:43 PM Derrick Stolee wrote: > > I have a branch available [1], but I'm seeing some failures only > > on FreeBSD [2] and I can't understand why that platform is failing > > this test. The current version (as of this writing) does not do > > the substring replacement technique, and hence it just gives up > > on exact matches. I will try the substring approach as an > > alternative and see where that gets me. > > > > [1] https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/924 > > [2] https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/924/checks?check_run_id=2256079534 > > The "+" in patterns such as `+refs/heads/\\*:refs/prefetch...` is what > is throwing it off. FreeBSD `grep` doesn't seem to like it, though > it's not clear why. Escaping it the same way as you escaped "*" > doesn't make it work. Replacing "+" with catchall "." does work, so > that's one way to fix it. > > However, all the escaping you need to do in these refspec patterns to > pass them to `grep` is ugly. A much better solution may be to change > the `grep` in test-lib-functions.sh:test_subcommand() to `grep -F` to > force it to match literally. That way, you can drop all the backslash > escaping, including those in front of "[" and "]". A cursory audit of > callers test_subcommand() seems to indicate that none of them pass > regex patterns, so using `-F` is probably safe and a good idea. > > By the way, the `coccinelle` check is also "failing", correctly > suggesting that you change: > > strbuf_addf(&replace, ":refs/prefetch/"); > > to: > > strbuf_addstr(&replace, ":refs/prefetch/"); > > in `builtin/gc.c`. Was curious - so rolled all Eric's feedback into a patch. This passes 'make test' and 'make coccicheck' locally, not sure about FreeBSD. Stolee - can you squash this onto your PR and try it if you agree? --Tom diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c index 98229bda25fd..eb4a03a2b47b 100644 --- a/builtin/gc.c +++ b/builtin/gc.c @@ -894,7 +894,7 @@ static int fetch_remote(struct remote *remote, void *cbdata) if (index_of_refs) { struct strbuf replace = STRBUF_INIT; strbuf_add(&replace, raw, index_of_refs - raw); - strbuf_addf(&replace, ":refs/prefetch/"); + strbuf_addstr(&replace, ":refs/prefetch/"); strbuf_addstr(&replace, index_of_refs + 6); strvec_push(&child.args, replace.buf); diff --git a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh index 93ae93b73611..3366ea188782 100755 --- a/t/t7900-maintenance.sh +++ b/t/t7900-maintenance.sh @@ -142,8 +142,8 @@ test_expect_success 'prefetch multiple remotes' ' test_commit -C clone2 two && GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/run-prefetch.txt" git maintenance run --task=prefetch 2>/dev/null && fetchargs="--prune --no-tags --no-write-fetch-head --recurse-submodules=no --refmap= --quiet" && - test_subcommand git fetch remote1 $fetchargs +refs/heads/\\*:refs/prefetch/remotes/remote1/\\*