From: Danh Doan <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:34:39 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] configure: respect --without-openssl
Message-ID: <20200318113439.GA29808@danh.dev>
In-Reply-To: <20200318112213.GB366567@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>

On 2020-03-18 11:22:13+0000, "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> wrote:
> On 2020-03-18 at 07:38:02, Đoàn Trần Công Danh wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Đoàn Trần Công Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  configure.ac | 12 +++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> > index 7468eb6bc8..20a11e1f32 100644
> > --- a/configure.ac
> > +++ b/configure.ac
> > @@ -544,9 +544,15 @@ GIT_STASH_FLAGS($OPENSSLDIR)
> >  
> >  AC_CHECK_LIB([crypto], [SHA1_Init],
> >  [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=],
> > -[AC_CHECK_LIB([ssl], [SHA1_Init],
> > - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=YesPlease NO_OPENSSL=],
> > - [NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=          NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease])])
> > +[
> > +if "x$NO_OPENSSL" = xYesPlease; then
> > +	AC_MSG_ERROR([Disabled OpenSSL is required for SHA1])
> 
> I don't see this in the original.  Wouldn't we want to fall back to the
> default in this case, which would be SHA1DC?

This block of code will be run into in macOS only.

Really, I wasn't sure what should be done in this case (I mentioned in
the cover letter).

Should we set:

	NEEDS_SSL_WITH_CRYPTO=
	NO_OPENSSL=YesPlease

in this case instead?

-- 
Danh