From: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 22:27:11 GMT
Subject: Re: Signed commit regression?
Message-ID: <20200228222711.GA9290@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqlfomefj2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 2020-02-28 at 18:24:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I've prepared a topic to revert that commit and it is now in the
> middle of 'pu'; it will get merged down to 'next', 'master' and
> 'maint' in due course as other topics.
> 
> Brian's SHA-256 (1/4) topic had a couple of changes that depended on
> the GPG interface API from 72b006f4 ("gpg-interface: prefer
> check_signature() for GPG verification", 2019-11-27), so I ejected
> them out of the topic for now:
> 
>     - tag: store SHA-256 signatures in a header
>     - gpg-interface: improve interface for parsing tags

That's fine.  I'll rebase my series on top of that patch.  Thanks for
letting me know.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204