From: Todd Zullinger Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 03:33:25 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] pretty: implement 'reference' format Message-ID: <20191115033325.GC3898@pobox.com> In-Reply-To: <470a2b0f4fd450af1d9c9d27ec0f0c91ea59117f.1573764280.git.liu.denton@gmail.com> Denton Liu wrote: > index 90ff9e2bea..91edeaf6d5 100644 > --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt > +++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ list. > exclude (that is, '{caret}commit', 'commit1..commit2', > and 'commit1\...commit2' notations cannot be used). > + > -With `--pretty` format other than `oneline` (for obvious reasons), > +With `--pretty` format other than `oneline` and `reference` (for obvious reasons), > this causes the output to have two extra lines of information > taken from the reflog. The reflog designator in the output may be shown > as `ref@{Nth}` (where `Nth` is the reverse-chronological index in the > @@ -293,6 +293,8 @@ Under `--pretty=oneline`, the commit message is > prefixed with this information on the same line. > This option cannot be combined with `--reverse`. > See also linkgit:git-reflog[1]. > ++ > +Under `--pretty=summary`, this information will not be shown at all. I think the line above wants s/summary/reference. -- Todd