From: Jeff King Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 04:56:38 GMT Subject: [PATCH 10/23] fsck_describe_object(): build on our get_object_name() primitive Message-ID: <20191018045638.GJ17879@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <20191018044103.GA17625@sigill.intra.peff.net> This isolates the implementation detail of using the decoration code to our put/get functions. Signed-off-by: Jeff King --- Arguably this could be squashed into the previous commit. By not doing so, it made describe_object() more of a pure code movement. fsck.c | 5 +---- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fsck.c b/fsck.c index ecd5957362..b0c4de67c9 100644 --- a/fsck.c +++ b/fsck.c @@ -351,10 +351,7 @@ const char *fsck_describe_object(struct fsck_options *options, }; static int b = 0; struct strbuf *buf; - char *name = NULL; - - if (options->object_names) - name = lookup_decoration(options->object_names, obj); + const char *name = fsck_get_object_name(options, obj); buf = bufs + b; b = (b + 1) % ARRAY_SIZE(bufs); -- 2.23.0.1228.gee29b05929