From: Matthew DeVore <matvore@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 20:53:05 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] list-objects-filter: implement composite filters
Message-ID: <20190531205305.GD4641@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <0d8973e7-5b29-fb09-a435-3bf2ec23269f@jeffhostetler.com>

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:01:47AM -0400, Jeff Hostetler wrote:
> BTW, I don't think I've seen this mentioned anywhere and I don't
> remember if this got into the code or not.  But we discussed having
> a repo-local config setting to remember the filter-spec used by the
> partial clone that would be inherited by a subsequent (partial) fetch.
> Or would be set by the first partial fetch following a normal clone.
> Having a single composite filter spec would help with this.

Isn't that what the partial_clone_get_default_filter_spec function is for? I
forgot about that. Perhaps with Emily's suggestion to use parsing functions in
the C library and the other cleanups I've applied since the first roll-up, using
the URL encoding will seem nicer. Let me try that...