From: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2019 10:03:53 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 00/27] Convert "git stash" to C builtin
Message-ID: <20190303100353.GV6085@hank.intra.tgummerer.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqtvgk3g1u.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 03/03, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > As I was advocating for this series to go into 'next' without a large
> > refactor of this series, I'll put my money were my mouth is and try to
> > make the cleanups and fixes required, though without trying to avoid
> > further external process calls, or changing the series around too
> > much.
> 
> Thanks for a well-written summary.  One thing that is missing in the
> write-up is if you kept the same base (i.e. on top of eacdb4d24f) or
> rebased the series on top of somewhere else.  I'd assume you built
> on the same base as before in the meantime (I'll know soon enough,
> when I sit down on a terminal and resume working on the code ;-)

Right, I forgot mentioning that.  Yes it is still based on eacdb4d24f,
as there was no good reason to change that.