From: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 22:13:49 GMT
Subject: Re: GSoC 2019: Git's application submitted
Message-ID: <20190212221349.GH6085@hank.intra.tgummerer.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAP8UFD19Mhpm4MRjQ3xsPx-_Gc6CweTWC3aHbqyhyy0C0dvR1g@mail.gmail.com>

On 02/12, Christian Couder wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:25 PM Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 02/12, Christian Couder wrote:
> 
> > > Yeah, using more of the libgit.a API, instead of the run_command API,
> > > and writing technical documentation on the stash commit format look
> > > like good ideas to me. I think I will add those items to the project
> > > description if you don't mind.
> >
> > Sure that sounds good, thanks!  I think using more of the libgit.a API
> > should probably be an optional endeavor, but writing the technical
> > documentation may be a good thing to include in the project.
> 
> Ok, there is now the following at the end of the idea:
> 
> "This will include writing the technical documentation of the stash
> format, and optionally refactoring the `git stash` code to use more of
> the libgit.a API, instead of the run_command API."

Thanks, this sounds good to me.