From: Max Kirillov Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 07:58:38 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5562: do not reuse output files Message-ID: <20181124075838.GG5348@jessie.local> In-Reply-To: On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:47:19PM +0900, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > a better workaround might be to write into unique output filenames > (act1.out, act2.out, etc.); that way, you do not have to worry about > the output file for the next request getting clobbered by a stale > process handling the previous request. Yes I agree > But at the same time, > wouldn't this suggest that the test or the previous request may see > an incomplete output, Yes it may miss the child's message. But in this case of failed http-backend process, there should be already one "fatal:" message in the act.err from the parent, and missing another one does not change the outcome.