From: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 02:21:51 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Base SHA-256 algorithm implementation
Message-ID: <20180830022151.GI432229@genre.crustytoothpaste.net>
In-Reply-To: <874lfdecoa.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:37:25AM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

> It seems to me that aside from t/helper/test-hash-speed.c and
> t/t0014-hash.sh everything being added here modifies existing files with
> many authors, and would thus also need their permission to re-license as
> anything except GPLv2.
> 
> Or do you mean whatever fixes/changes you did to libtomcrypt (living in
> sha256/block/ in this series) you consider e.g. LPGL instead of GPL?

Yes, that's what I mean, specifically the code in sha256/block.  libgit2
is GPLv2 with a linking exception, I believe, but either way I'd be fine
with it.

It wasn't my intention to offer code I didn't wholly author, so thanks
for clarifying.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204