From: Florian Gamböck <mail@floga.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:37:49 GMT
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] completion: load completion file for external subcommand
Message-ID: <20180410093749.GA8706@arbeitsviech>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq8t9w591b.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com>

On 2018-04-10 07:06, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Florian Gamböck <mail@floga.de> writes:
>> Does my reasoning make sense?
>
> Not at all.

:-( That actually hurt a bit.

> But ...
>
>> I mean, the result will be exactly the same, we are clearly only 
>> talking about readability here.
>
> ... I agree, and I also think the "readability" is not absolute 
> anyway.
>
> FWIW, personally I'd find "if $completion_func does not yet exist and 
> a way to dynload stuff exists, then use that way to load it from an 
> external file" the most natural way to express what you are doing.

Then let's go with that. Maybe I am overthinking things here and 
re-wording doesn't hurt.

I'll send a new patch version later this day, including the commit 
message re-wording suggestion from Stefan.

Thank you for your feedback!

-- 
Regards

Florian