From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 18:51:52 GMT
Subject: Re: [Problem] test_must_fail makes possibly questionable assumptions about exit_code.
Message-ID: <20180228185152.GE251290@aiede.svl.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <005901d3b0c0$f5acd370$e1067a50$@nexbridge.com>

Randall S. Becker wrote:
> On February 28, 2018 12:44 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Randall S. Becker wrote:

>>> The problem is actually in git code in its test suite that uses perl
>>> inline, not in my test code itself.
[...]
>> Can you elaborate with an example?  My understanding was that
>> test_must_fail is only for running git.
[...]
> Have a look at a recent t1404 as a sample. Line 615 is the one causing the
> platform grief, because it triggers a 'die'. However, the particular test
> case #54, had no difference on platform with test_must_fail or !, which has
> the same underlying EBADF completion after digging and digging.

Sorry to be dense: what I see on that line is

	test_must_fail git update-ref -d $prefix/foo >out 2>err &&

How is perl involved?

Puzzled,
Jonathan