From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 21:06:07 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] check-ref-format doc: --branch validates and expands <branch>
Message-ID: <20171017210607.rwvaxarkallzahq6@aiede.mtv.corp.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqq60bdo5op.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:

>> From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
>>
>> "git check-ref-format --branch $name" feature was originally
>> introduced (and was advertised) as a way for scripts to take any
>> end-user supplied string (like "master", "@{-1}" etc.) and see if it
>> is usable when Git expects to see a branch name, and also obtain the
>> concrete branch name that the at-mark magic expands to.
>>
>> Emphasize that "see if it is usable" role in the description and
>> clarify that the @{...} expansion only occurs when run from within a
>> repository.
>>
>> [jn: split out from a larger patch]
>>
>> Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
>> ---
>
> Missing sign-off, unlike the other two, intended?

Oops.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>

> I'll take these three to replace what I tentatively queued, not
> necessarily because I like the change in 1/3 better, but because
> these are explained much better; besides I prefer a version that at
> least two people deeply looked at.

Okay, thanks.  I'll add the rest of the change as a patch on top. :)

Thanks,
Jonathan