From: Jeff King Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 11:20:29 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] t6010: test actual test output Message-ID: <20170915112028.ksrpv637jsd7giox@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <089cdbf6-7556-6fba-21f2-6602c5ca8920@grubix.eu> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:01:27PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 14.09.2017 16:34: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > >> 4f21454b55 ("merge-base: handle --fork-point without reflog", > >> 2016-10-12) introduced a fix for merge-base --fork-point without reflog > >> and a test. While that test is fine, it did not update expected nor actual > >> output and tested that of the previous test instead. > > > > Oops. The use of the existing "expect3" was intentional (the idea being > > that we are repeating the identical step from the previous test with the > > slight tweak of not having a reflog). But obviously failing to write to > > "actual" at all was a mistake. > > > > That said, I'm OK with reiterating the expected output. > > expect3 had a different content, too ;) Oh, then it was just horribly broken, then. Oops. :) Thanks for fixing. -Peff