From: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 13:32:53 GMT
Subject: Re: ignoring extra bitmap file?
Message-ID: <20170828133253.GA23438@inner.h.apk.li>
In-Reply-To: <20170818065333.7povtg6b4sugnnfg@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Fri, 18 Aug 2017 02:53:34 +0000, Jeff King wrote:
...
> Whether there's a .bitmap doesn't impact whether .pack and .idx files
> are deleted. The next full repack would pack everything into a new big
> pack, and then delete any existing files, including .pack, .idx, and
> .bitmap.

It took a bit of patience, but the extra packs and .bitmaps
finally went away without intervention.

However, now I have a few GB sitting in loose objects that
refuse to vanish yet. Bryan might be interested here;
how often is bitbucket 4.latest doing prune-objects
(with auto-gc disabled)?

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800