From: Simon Ruderich Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 14:43:15 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] grep: add support for the PCRE v1 JIT API Message-ID: <20170514144315.w46t7iggp7yeqn4n@ruderich.org> In-Reply-To: <20170513234535.12749-5-avarab@gmail.com> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 11:45:32PM +0000, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: > [snip] > > +#ifdef PCRE_CONFIG_JIT > + if (p->pcre1_jit_on) > + ret = pcre_jit_exec(p->pcre1_regexp, p->pcre1_extra_info, line, > + eol - line, 0, flags, ovector, > + ARRAY_SIZE(ovector), p->pcre1_jit_stack); > + else > + ret = pcre_exec(p->pcre1_regexp, p->pcre1_extra_info, line, > + eol - line, 0, flags, ovector, > + ARRAY_SIZE(ovector)); > +#else > ret = pcre_exec(p->pcre1_regexp, p->pcre1_extra_info, line, eol - line, > 0, flags, ovector, ARRAY_SIZE(ovector)); > +#endif Wouldn't it be simpler to remove the duplication and unconditionally use the old pcre_exec() call? Something like this: +#ifdef PCRE_CONFIG_JIT + if (p->pcre1_jit_on) + ret = pcre_jit_exec(p->pcre1_regexp, p->pcre1_extra_info, line, + eol - line, 0, flags, ovector, + ARRAY_SIZE(ovector), p->pcre1_jit_stack); + else +#endif ret = pcre_exec(p->pcre1_regexp, p->pcre1_extra_info, line, eol - line, 0, flags, ovector, ARRAY_SIZE(ovector)); > if (ret < 0 && ret != PCRE_ERROR_NOMATCH) > die("pcre_exec failed with error code %d", ret); > if (ret > 0) { > @@ -394,7 +420,16 @@ static int pcre1match(struct grep_pat *p, const char *line, const char *eol, > static void free_pcre1_regexp(struct grep_pat *p) > { > pcre_free(p->pcre1_regexp); > +#ifdef PCRE_CONFIG_JIT > + if (p->pcre1_jit_on) { > + pcre_free_study(p->pcre1_extra_info); > + pcre_jit_stack_free(p->pcre1_jit_stack); > + } else { > + pcre_free(p->pcre1_extra_info); > + } > +#else > pcre_free(p->pcre1_extra_info); > +#endif Same here. The pcre_free() is the same with and without the ifdef. Regards Simon -- + privacy is necessary + using gnupg http://gnupg.org + public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9