From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 18:00:26 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] t7004, t7030: fix here-doc syntax errors
Message-ID: <20170324180025.nlxcrgj4c7dg2sxj@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170324164943.7vvtcj5sqadj625o@sigill.intra.peff.net>

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:49:43PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:45:30AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > I actually think this uncovers another class of breakage.  t7030
> > tests should be protected with GPG prereq and 'fourth-signed' that
> > is made only with the prereq in the first test will not be found.
> 
> It seems like t7030 should just skip_all when the GPG prereq is not
> met (it's not wrong to mark each test that's added, but it would have
> made this particular mistake harder).
> 
> > t7004 probably has the same issue.
> 
> These ones should be marked individually, though.

I started to prepare a patch for t7030, but given that we want to do
this all in one patch anyway (for bisectability), I think it probably
makes sense to just add the missing GPG prereqs as part of the patch you
posted. If somebody wants to convert t7030 to skip_all on top that's
fine, but it's not that big a deal.

-Peff