From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:24:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] tag: add format specifier to gpg_verify_tag
Message-ID: <20170117152455.k6zkeclsyawzpl2n@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170115184705.10376-4-santiago@nyu.edu>

On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:47:01PM -0500, santiago@nyu.edu wrote:

> From: Lukas Puehringer <luk.puehringer@gmail.com>
> 
> Calling functions for gpg_verify_tag() may desire to print relevant
> information about the header for further verification. Add an optional
> format argument to print any desired information after GPG verification.

Hrm. Maybe I am missing something, but what does:

  verify_and_format_tag(sha1, name, fmt, flags);

get you over:

  gpg_verify_tag(sha1, name, flags);
  pretty_print_ref(name, sha1, fmt);

? The latter seems much more flexible, and I do not see how the
verification step impacts the printing at all (or vice versa).

I could understand it more if there were patches later in the series
that somehow used the format and verification results together. But I
didn't see that.

-Peff