From: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2017 18:24:33 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] road to reentrant real_path
Message-ID: <20170109182433.GC62878@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzij0t7uh.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On 01/09, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com> writes:
> 
> >> How does this relate to the 5-patch real_path: series that has been
> >> on 'next' since last year?
> >
> > The only difference should be in the first patch of the series which
> > handles the #define a bit differently due to the discussion that
> > happened last week.
> >
> > Here is the interdiff between v5 and 'origin/bw/realpath-wo-chdir':
> 
> Then can you make that an incremental patch (or two) with its own
> log message instead?  It (or they) would look and smell like a
> bugfix patch that follows up a change that has already landed.  As
> you know, we won't eject and replace patches that are already in
> 'next' during a development cycle.
> 
> Thanks.

Yes I'll get right on that.

-- 
Brandon Williams