From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 20:17:21 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] sha1_file: open window into packfiles with O_CLOEXEC
Message-ID: <20161026201721.2pw4slsuyhxhcwxj@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqpomnatg6.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:52:41AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > I actually wonder if it is worth carrying around the O_NOATIME hack at
> > all.
> 
> Yes, I share the thought.  We no longer have too many loose objects
> to matter.
> 
> I do not mind flipping the order, but I'd prefer to cook the result
> even longer.  I am tempted to suggest we take two step route:
> 
>  - ship 2.11 with the "atime has been there and we won't regress it"
>    shape, while cooking the "cloexec is semantically more
>    important" version in 'next' during the feature freeze
> 
>  - immediately after 2.11 merge it to 'master' for 2.12 to make sure
>    there is no fallout.

That sounds reasonable, though I'd consider jumping straight to "NOATIME
is not worth it; drop it" as the patch for post-2.11.

-Peff