From: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 23:55:50 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] format-patch: Add --rfc for the common case of [RFC PATCH]
Message-ID: <20160919235550.GC29421@cloud>
In-Reply-To: <CA+P7+xp-CupfFwQv+U-KNh4bxG9Mxkbfip5RJebKX9gjffoOsw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:46:06PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 04:34:35PM -0700, Jeff King wrote:
> >> As far as your patch goes, I'd be OK with defining:
> >>
> >>   --rfc::
> >>       Pretend as if `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'` was given.
> >>
> 
> Would:
> 
> Shorthand for `--subject-prefix='RFC PATCH'`
> 
> be a better reading? I feel like using "pretend" is a bit weird here.

My patch used "Alias for"; if you prefer "Shorthand for" I'm
indifferent. :)