From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:38:04 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use strbuf_addstr() for adding constant strings to a strbuf, part 2
Message-ID: <20160915193804.d2mmmeard2rj6vye@sigill.intra.peff.net>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqbmzpnex4.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:25:43PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> >> Silly question: Is there a natural language that uses percent signs
> >> as letters or e.g. instead of commas? :)
> >
> > I don't know, but if they do, they'd better get used to escaping them.
> > :)
> 
> I do not know either, but I am curious where that question comes
> from.  I stared at this patch for a few minutes but couldn't guess.

My initial thought is that the next step after picking this low-hanging
fruit would be to find cases where the strings do not contain "%", and
thus we do not have to care about formatting. But a case like:

  strbuf_addf(&buf, "this does not have any percents!", foo);

is simply broken (albeit in a way that we ignore foo, so it's just ugly
code, not a real bug).

So I dunno. I too am curious.

-Peff