From: David Aguilar Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:26:25 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-subtree.sh: Use --allow-unrelated-histories when splitting with --rejoin Message-ID: <20160721052625.GA31423@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <010201560af48050-012ea887-a1e1-4d1b-82d3-4799ac7788bc-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> [cc'd Roberto for submitGit q's] On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 12:56:51AM +0000, Brett Cundal wrote: > --- The message on the pull request[1] has a better justification for this change, which would have been nice in the commit message itself: Git 2.9 added a check against merging unrelated histories, which is exactly what git subtree with --rejoin does. Adding the --allow-unrelated-histories flag to merge will override this check. Is it possible that maybe submitGit can detect an empty commit message for single-commit PRs and transplant that message onto it? As-is, the commit itself should probably be amended to contain that information. > contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh > index 7a39b30..556cd92 100755 > --- a/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh > +++ b/contrib/subtree/git-subtree.sh > @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ cmd_split() > if [ -n "$rejoin" ]; then > debug "Merging split branch into HEAD..." > latest_old=$(cache_get latest_old) > - git merge -s ours \ > + git merge -s ours --allow-unrelated-histories \ > -m "$(rejoin_msg "$dir" $latest_old $latest_new)" \ > $latest_new >&2 || exit $? > fi > > -- With the above description this change makes more sense, but it seems that the existing tests do not detect the breakage fixed by this patch. Can you please add a test case in t/t7900-subtree.sh demonstrating the breakage? Looks good otherwise. [1] https://github.com/git/git/pull/274 -- David