From: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:56:11 GMT
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.9.1
Message-ID: <20160712005611.GA16810@dcvr.yhbt.net>
In-Reply-To: <20160711235417.GA26163@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> Otherwise, we'll have to skip the test, perhaps with something like the
> patch below. I suspect the problem is actually the size of "unsigned
> long", not time_t, as we use that internally for a bunch of time
> computation.

We should probably be using int64_t for time calculations;
"unsigned long" is 32-bits on 32-bit x86 systems.