From: Jeff King Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:18:22 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH] shallow clone to not imply shallow submodules Message-ID: <20160620171821.GA2316@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:14:47AM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote: > > This follows the style of the other tests, so it's the right thing here. > > But as a style suggestion, I think: > > > > git -C super_clone/sub log --oneline >lines && > > test_line_count = 3 lines > > > > is nicer than the subshell. It's more succinct, and it saves a process. > > which we would want to refactor to in a follow up, but not merge it > through to 2.9.1. Yeah, exactly. That was what I meant by "here". -Peff