From: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:14:19 GMT
Subject: Re: Code review tool recommendations - replacement for crucible?
Message-ID: <20160616121419.GQ30134@inner.h.apk.li>
In-Reply-To: <20160616105556.GA8721@salo>

On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:55:56 +0000, Richard Ipsum wrote:
...
> Have you considered Gerrit[1] already?
> It would seem to handle the cases you're interested in.

Possible, but only after a lot of user education.

We don't currently rewrite commits for review comments, and
neither can we get (all) people to create feature-oriented
commits, so we really need to review multiple commits in
one review, and assign reviewers to subtrees. We could do
that by repacking the changes into new commits, but that
would defeat the purpose.

Also, we often do reviews after feature integration,
and also do partial reviews long before a new
project is integrated.

In other words: Lots of impedance mismatch.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800