From: Richard Ipsum <richard.ipsum@codethink.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:55:56 GMT
Subject: Re: Code review tool recommendations - replacement for crucible?
Message-ID: <20160616105556.GA8721@salo>
In-Reply-To: <20160616094108.GA14661@inner.h.apk.li>

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:41:08AM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm looking for pointers to review tools that work with git (obviously),
> and can deal sensibly with bigger reviews. Things we need:
> 
> - Ability to split (set of) commits into multiple reviews,
>   so parts of changes can be reviewed by the respective owners
>   (or assign different reviewers to different files/subtrees
>   in a review).
> 
> - Tracking of files (or changes) already reviewed (due to the large numbers),
>   and of the handling of issues found so far.
> 
> - Support incremental reviews, not just e.g. over the content of a
>   pull request (bitbucket) When review comments are processed people
>   want to be able to only review that change, and not to be forced
>   to find that change in the entire previous changeset without
>   the tool's support.
> 

Hey,

Have you considered Gerrit[1] already?
It would seem to handle the cases you're interested in.

[1]: https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/