From: Jeff King Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 22:04:55 GMT Subject: Re: Mark remote `gc --auto` error messages Message-ID: <20160602220454.GA17202@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:59:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > > So the greater question is not "should this output be marked" but > > "should auto-gc data go over the sideband so that all clients see it > > (and any server-side stderr does not)". And I think the answer is > > probably yes. And that fixes the "remote: " thing as a side effect. > > Thanks for stating this a lot more clearly than I could, and I agree > that sending this to the other side regardless of the protocol is > the right thing. I somehow doubt that server operators would check > Apache logs to decide when to do a proper GC, so I do not consider > it a true loss ;-) I definitely agree. I'd wonder more about "would they want their users to see these details". I dunno. I am only intimately familiar with one git hosting site, and we turn off auto-gc completely. -Peff