From: Jeff King Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 18:25:45 GMT Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fsck: detect and warn a commit with embedded NUL Message-ID: <20160414182544.GC22068@sigill.intra.peff.net> In-Reply-To: <20160414182102.GB22068@sigill.intra.peff.net> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 02:21:03PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > So yet another alternative would be to include this check in > verify_headers(). It would parse to the end of the headers as now, and > then from there additionally look for a NUL in the body. Hmm. Looking at verify_headers(), I think it has another bug. It wants to "return report(...)" as soon as it sees a problem, and stops looking for other ones. But the new model for reporting errors is that report() might ignore a problem if configured to do so. So I think if you were to ignore NUL_IN_HEADER, then a commit with NUL_IN_HEADER could still pass fsck, even though it should trigger UNTERMINATED_HEADER. -Peff