From: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 01:43:55 GMT
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] tag: use pgp_verify_function in tag -v call
Message-ID: <20160405014354.GA12006@LykOS>
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cQkqaYd2Vpgpd5jB8ZUD41VvjryB8tYc9JNEydNaKrr=Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:39:29PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:22 PM,  <santiago@nyu.edu> wrote:
> > Instead of running the verify-tag plumbing command, we use the
> > pgp_verify_tag(). This avoids the usage of an extra fork call. To do
> > this, we extend the number of parameters that tag.c takes, and
> > verify-tag passes. Redundant calls done in the pgp_verify_tag function
> > are removed.
> 
> I'm confused about everything following "an extra fork call" since
> those subsequent sentences don't seem to pertain to this patch. Is
> that leftover gunk from the previous version of this series?

Yes, I thought I had taken this part of the commit message away. 
I'll take it out right away. Apologies for this.

-Santiago.